Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Pack

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 26, 1988No. 5314PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

The plaintiff brought this action on April 26,1983, to establish the paternity of her second child, a daughter born out of wedlock on March 27, 1983. A judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant. The state of Connecticut, a party to this action pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-160,1 has appealed from the denial of its petition for a new trial. We find no error.

The following facts are relevant to this appeal. This action was tried to the court, Gerety, J., on March 7, 1985. On March 22,1985, subsequent to trial but before judgment was rendered, the trial court ordered the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  2. State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Krooner v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hryniewicz v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. Bleidner v. SearlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Randolph v. MambrinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API