Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.

The plaintiff, James Black, a resident of Connecticut, brought this petition for a new trial under the provisions of § 52-270 of the General Statutes.1 It is admitted in the pleadings that the defendant, a finance company hereinafter referred to as C.I.T., had instituted an action against Black to recover an amount alleged to be due on the pur*190chase price of an automobile which Black had bought from a Ford dealer. A deficiency judgment was rendered in favor of C.I.T. for the balance remaining after the car had been repossessed and resold by C.I.T. Counsel in argument assumed, although it is…