Legal Opinion
Hryniewicz v. Wilson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 5, 1999No. AC 17262PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The plaintiffs, Paul Hryniewicz and West Service Corporation (West Service), appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This case, a petition for new trial, arises out of the plaintiffs’ prior appeal to this court in Wilson v. Hryniewicz, 38 Conn. App. 715, 663 A.2d 1073, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 918, 665 A.2d 610 (1995). The plaintiffs in the present case were defendants in Wilson and claimed on appeal in that case that the trial court improperly denied (1) their motion to strike and (2) their motions for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- LaSalle National Bank v. Freshfield Meadows, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Doty v. Shawmut BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Jacobs v. FazzanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Wilson v. HryniewiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Syragakis v. SyragakisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.