DeVito v. Schwartz
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
In this defamation action, the counterclaim plaintiff, Edward Schwartz, appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court after the court denied his motion to set aside the verdict. On appeal, Schwartz claims that the court improperly denied his motion because the defamatory statements made by the coun*230terclaim defendant, Albert DeVito, were slanderous per se, and, therefore, he was entitled to at least some damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. In November, 1996, DeVito initiated an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Battista v. United Illuminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Riccio v. AbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Ham v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Skakel v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Lawton v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Edwards v. Community Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Lega Siciliana Social Club, Inc. v. GermaineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Craig v. Colonial Penn InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.