Legal Opinion
Craig v. Colonial Penn Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 15, 2004No. 3:02CV1630JBAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 68]; Motions to Preclude Plaintiffs from Presenting Affidavits from Plaintiff in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment [Docs. ##72, 74]; Motion to Strike Unsupported Factual Allegations in Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 91]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendant Colonial Penn Insurance Company (“Colonial Penn”) has moved for summary judgment in its favor on all counts in plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s summary judgment motion [Doc. # 68] is granted.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCulloch v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Byra-Grzegorczyk v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Maioriello v. New York State Office for People with Developmental DisabilitiesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Exantus v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Known Litigation Holdings, LLC v. Navigators Ins.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.