Legal Opinion
In Re the Petition for Recall of Beasley
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1996No. 63270-7; 63273-1PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
— Pasco School Board members Robert Sandoval and Aaron Beasley appeal from a judgment find ing the charges in two recall petitions to be legally and factually sufficient for submission to voters. We reverse.
On August 24, 1995, Dennis Duncan and Robert Silvey, individually and on behalf of an organization called Citizens for a Quality School Board (respondents), filed identical petitions to recall appellants Sandoval and Beasley. Each petition contains two charges. The first charge alleges that appellants conspired with former school board member Brenda High to compel Superintendent George…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Cole v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Teaford v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re the Recall of WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Recall of ShipmanWashington Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Wood v. Battle Ground School Dist.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Wood v. Battle Ground School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In re the Recall of AckersonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.