Legal Opinion

Hill v. Sears, Roebuck and Co

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2012No. Docket 143329, 143348, and 143633PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMary Beth Kelly, J.

These cases arise out of an explosion that destroyed plaintiff Marcy Hill’s Clinton Township home after she released natural gas through an uncapped gas line, which ignited when her adult daughter attempted to light a candle, after they had both actually smelled the gas in the home throughout the day and evening. Plaintiffs1 filed suit against the retailers, delivery companies, and installers of plaintiffs’ electric dryer, which had been installed nearly four years earlier and had functioned without incident. We heard oral argument on the applications to consider in part “(1) whether the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Clark v. DalmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Henry v. Dow Chemical CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Bailey v. SchaafMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Lela Tompkins v. Crown Corr, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. David Finazzo v. Fire Equipment CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. RAM International, Inc. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Cleveland Indians Baseball Co. L.P. v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API