Legal Opinion

In re Consumers Energy Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2014No. Docket Nos. 305066 and 305083PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RECONSIDERATION

Before: RONAYNE KRAUSE, EJ., and FITZGERALD and WHITBECK, JJ. RONAYNE KRAUSE, P.J.

In these consolidated cases appellants TES Filer City Station Limited Partnership and the Attorney General claim appeals from an order of the Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) in Consumers Energy Company’s power supply cost recovery (PSCR) case. We affirm.

I. UNDERLYING PACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On March 31, 2010, Consumers filed an application with the PSC seeking approval of its PSCR and revenues for the calendar year 2009.1 Consumers sought an underrecovery of $34,378,062, including…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. in Re Application of Consumers Energy for Reconciliation of CostsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership v. Upper Peninsula Power CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. in Re Application of Consumers Energy for Reconciliation of CostsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. in Re Application of Consumers Energy for Reconciliation of CostsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. in Re Application of Dte Electric Company for 2015 ReconciliationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API