Legal Opinion

Rovas v. SBC Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2008No. Docket Nos. 134493 and 134500PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This case concerns judicial review of an administrative agency’s interpretation of a statute. This Court has not always been precise in articulating the proper standard for reviewing such interpretations. However, in accordance with longstanding Michigan precedent and basic separation of powers principles, we hold and reaffirm that an agency’s interpretation of a statute is entitled to “respectful consideration,” but courts may not abdicate their judicial responsibility to interpret statutes by giving unfettered deference to an agency’s interpretation. Courts must respect legislative…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Paris Meadows, LLC v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. Konopka (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & SurveyorsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  5. Drew v. Cass CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API