Legal Opinion

Robinson v. City of Lansing

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2010No. Docket 138669PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

At issue here is whether the two-inch rule of MCL 691.1402a(2), which provides that a discontinuity defect of less than two inches in a sidewalk creates a rebuttable inference that the municipality maintained the sidewalk in reasonable repair, applies to sidewalks adjacent to state highways, as with the sidewalk at issue here, or only to sidewalks adjacent to county highways. The trial court concluded that the rule only applies to sidewalks adjacent to county highways and, thus, granted plaintiffs motion to strike the rule as an affirmative defense and denied defendant’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Allison v. AEW CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLPMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bricker v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. McCAHAN v. BRENNANMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Moraccini v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Barclae v. ZarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. HustonMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Heather Lynn Hannay v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API