Legal Opinion
Fresenius Medical Care Holding Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 5, 2004No. C-03-1431 SBA EDLPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement suit between competitors, Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc, and Fresenius USA, Inc. (collectively “Fresenius”) and Baxter International, Inc. and Baxter Healthcare Corporation (collectively “Baxter.”) The patents in suit relate to kidney dialysis machines, specifically hemiodialysis machines and their various features.1 Fresenius’ Motion to Compel Discovery is presently before the Court. The Court held a hearing on January 27, 2004 and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- King Instruments Corporation v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. And Hawe Yue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Admiral Insurance v. United States District Court for the District of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Rainbow Pioneer 44-18-04a, a General Partnership v. Hawaii-Nevada Investment Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, and Herman B. RothbardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Duran v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.