Legal Opinion
In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 27, 2005No. MDL No. 1536; No. 03 C 4576PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This is the fourth opinion in connection with three multi-faceted discovery motions brought by the plaintiffs against various defendants.1 The facts are these: Following the filing of the consolidated amended class action complaint on September 5, 2003, charging a violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, plaintiffs served sixty-six document requests and ten interrogatories on Noranda, Inc., Falconbridge, Ltd. and Norfalco, LLC (“the Noranda defendants”). The requests sought specified classes of…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Autotech Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. Automationdirect.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Murata Manufacturing Co. v. Bel Fuse, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.