Legal Opinion
Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 21, 2010No. Civil Action No. 09-cv-01257-PAB-MEHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL
MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff BIAX’s Motion to Compel Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things ¡filed June 14, 2010; docket # 226 ]; Plaintiff BIAX’s Motion to Compel NVIDIA to Respond to Plaintiffs Third Set of Interrogatories and Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things [filed June 25, 2010; docket # 234 ]; and Plaintiff BIAX’s Motion to Compel the Sony Defendants to Respond to Plaintiffs Third Set of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- ResQNet. Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cameron Lanning Cormack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Radulescu v. Western Union CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021