Admiral Insurance v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Admiral Insurance Company petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate its order compelling production of statements obtained by Admiral’s counsel in anticipation of a securities fraud action. Petitioner contends that these statements are protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege. The district court ordered the statements produced upon plaintiffs’ assertion that the information sought was otherwise unavailable because the witnesses planned to invoke the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination at their…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Miller v. PancucciDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. Chevrontexoco Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.