Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Taylor
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 20, 2006No. 00-531 SLRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On May 30, 2000, plaintiffs, who were housed at the Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility “(Gander Hill”), filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (D.I.38) Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, were appointed counsel and an amended complaint was filed on November 23, 2002, on behalf of all pretrial detainees. (D.I.115) The amended complaint contains two counts alleging constitutional violations for conditions of confinement and failure to protect. A third count alleges a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hubbard v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Poole v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Hubbard v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Hubbard v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Hubbard v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.