Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hubbard v. Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 5, 2008No. 06-4627Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSloviter, Circuit Judge

Appellants are pre-trial detainees housed at Delaware’s Multipurpose Criminal Justice Facility, known as “Gander Hill,” who appeal the order of the District Court granting summary judgment in favor of prison officials (“prison officials” or “Appellees,” collectively) based on qualified immunity. The detainees claim that certain conditions of confinement, specifically the practice at Gander Hill of housing three detainees in cells designed for one person (“triple-celling”), violate then-rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. When this case was initially before this court, we held that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API