Legal Opinion

Poole v. Taylor

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 19, 2006No. CIV. 99-635-SLRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Samuel Turner Poole, proceeding pro se, filed this action on September 22, 1999, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement. At the time plaintiff filed the complaint, he was an inmate housed at the Multi-Purpose Criminal Justice Facility (“Gander Hill”). 1 (D.I.2) A supplement to the complaint was filed on October 29, 2003, adding a medical needs claim. (D.I.36, 37) Defendants filed an answer and plaintiff filed a “counterclaim” against the defendants. (D.I.49, 51, 60)

The case was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blackston v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  2. Brathwaite v. Correctional Medical ServicesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  3. Blizzard v. Commander, Delaware State Police Troop NineDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. Turner v. Correctional Medical ServicesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API