Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 5, 2008No. 06-4627PublishedCited by 324 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case comes to us for the second time. In Hubbard v. Taylor, 399 F.3d 150 (3d Cir.2005) (Hubbard I), we held that when pretrial detainees challenge conditions of confinement, their claims must be analyzed under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Because the District Court initially evaluated Plaintiffs’ claims under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, we vacated the order granting summary judgment to Defendants and remanded to the District Court for analysis under the Fourteenth Amendment. Fur*231…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Block v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Morse v. FrederickSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by324 opinions
- Walker v. SchultCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- E. D. v. Daniel SharkeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Yusef Steele v. Warden CicchiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Duran v. MerlineDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
319 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.