Legal Opinion

Uerling v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1933No. 28680PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tewell, District Judge.

The plaintiff in error, John H. Uerling, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the district court for Adams county for the crime of forgery, and has brought the record of his trial here for review.

The evidence discloses that one Jule Bassett, about the year 1918, sold his farm and turned the proceeds, several thousand dollars, over to the firm of Hoeppner & Uerling of Hastings, Nebraska, a copartnership, engaged in the business of selling real estate, making investments and loans and writing insurance for others. The firm consisted at all times of Ernest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Green v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Morearty v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Fitzgerald v. AndrewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Horacek v. KeeblerNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carlsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State v. GilletteNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. of Akron, Ohio v. NimtzNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bassinger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Conkling v. De LanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API