Legal Opinion

Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. of Akron, Ohio v. Nimtz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1954No. 33512PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

The relators filed a petition in the district court for Douglas County praying forthwith for a writ of mandamus against the five judges of the municipal court of the city of Omaha and the chief of police of the city of Omaha requiring the respondents to cease enforcing municipal court rule No. 12; from barring the relators from carrying on their bonding business in the municipal court of Omaha; to accept the appeal bond tendered on behalf of Fred H. Goodhart by relators; and to nullify the proceedings against relators taken under rule No. 12 of the municipal court. On the same day the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Concord Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Horton v. State ex rel. HaydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State, Ex Rel. Howell v. Schiele, Treas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Clark v. Lincoln Liberty Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GerberNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. ShadboltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Vodehnal v. Grand Island Daily IndependentNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Coulter v. McFarlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Calvert v. Lapeer Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API