Horacek v. Keebler
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Johnson county. It was an action for the replevin of five calves, brought by •Keebler against Iloracek. The jury found in favor of Keebler, and assessed his damages for the wrongful detention of the property at five dollars.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Johnson county. It was an action for the replevin of five calves, brought by •Keebler against Iloracek. The jury found in favor of Keebler, and assessed his damages for the wrongful detention of the property at five dollars. Judgment entered on the verdict, and IToracek brought the cause here by petition in error. cited General Statutes, 780. Bloom, v. Richards, 2 Ohio State, 388. Johnson v. Broxon, 13 Kan., 529. cited 2 Parsons Contracts, 764. PLill v. Sherwood, 3 Wis., 346.
1Opinion of the Court
Lake, Ge. J.
It is a well established rule of practice in this court, that, in order to entitle a party to a review of errors alleged to have occurred on the trial of a cause in the district court, he must bring such errors to the attention of that court by a motion for a new trial, in which they are distinctly pointed out. Midland Pacific Company v. McCartney, 1 Neb., 398. Mills v. Miller, 2 Id., 299. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Preston, 3 Id., 444. Horbach v. Miller, 4 Id., 31. We regard this rule as a very wholesome one, and which will be rigidly adhered to in the future.
In this case, the only…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Midland Pacific Railroad v. McCartneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
- Johnson v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Roberts v. BarnesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Uerling v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Fitzgerald v. AndrewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
- Glover v. CheathamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.