Legal Opinion

Carlsen v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1934No. 28976PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Defendant assigns error in a conviction for forgery. He was charged in twelve counts with the forgery of twelve interest coupons, was acquitted on four counts and was convicted on eight counts. All the coupons were due *13January 19, 1934. The first four were for $9.75 each and the other eight were for $15 each. The names of Mary A. McLoughlin and Thomas J. McLoughlin appeared as the makers. Each coupon contained these words: “Payment of this coupon is subject to the terms of principal bond of even date.” There are 116 assignments of error “relied upon for reversal.”

Carlsen was president and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weinecke v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McShane v. CannonNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Morearty v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Uerling v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lower v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ledwith v. Bankers Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Heckathorn v. HeckathornMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Carlsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In re Interest of LeVanta S.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API