Brantley v. . Collie
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.
The order of the court setting aside the verdict at the trial of this action, and ordering a new trial, is not reviewable by this Court. The order was made by the trial court in the exercise of its discretion. For that reason the plaintiff did not appeal from the order. In Bird v. Bradburn, 131 N. C., 488, 42 S. E., 936, it is said that the power of a trial court to set aside a verdict and to order a new trial, in its discretion, is inherent, and is necessary to the proper administration of justice, which is after all the function of a court. The power is recognized by statute (C. S., 591) ;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Bird v. Bradburn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Ballard v. Home National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Saylors v. State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Likas v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wall v. . BainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- General American Life Insurance v. StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Watkins v. . GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Harrison v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Harrison v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.