Legal Opinion

General American Life Insurance v. Stadiem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1943PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe question for decision is whether tbe complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, either in contract or in tort. C. S., 511, subsec. 6. Tbe office of a demurrer is to test tbe sufficiency of a pleading, admitting for tbe purpose tbe truth of factual averments well stated and such relevant inferences as may be deduced therefrom, but it does not admit any legal inferences or conclusions of law asserted by tbe pleader. Leonard v. Maxwell, Comr., 216 N. C., 89, 3 S. E. (2d), 316; Harris v. R. R., 220 N. C., 698, 18 S. E. (2d), 204. Hence, we must look to tbe allegations…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Valdez v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Shaw v. . BarnardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API