Harrison v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.
Neither at the close of plaintiff’s evidence nor at the close of all the evidence did the defendant make a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, as is allowed in C. S., 567.
In Harris v. Buie, 202 N. C., 634 (636), is the following: “At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the defendant Buie did not move for judgment as in case of nonsuit in the court below, nor at the close of all the evidence, as he had a right to do under C. S., 567. By the failure of defendant to follow strictly C. S., 567, supra, the question of the insufficiency of evidence is waived. Nowell v. Basnight, 185 N. C.,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Huestess v. South Atlantic Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Johnson v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Hines v. New England Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Anthony v. Teachers Protective UnionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Tedder v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1977
- Shenandoah Life Insurance v. HawesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966