Legal Opinion

In re Beiny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1987PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The present motion for suppression of allegedly improperly obtained material and disqualification of counsel comes in the context of a trust accounting proceeding commenced by petitioner Martin Wynyard. Wynyard and his family are the beneficiaries of the trust in question which has as its corpus 45% of the voting shares of the Antique Company of New York (ACNY). The trustee of this trust and respondent to the Wynyard petition is Wynyard’s sister, Rotraut L.U. Beiny (hereinafter the Trustee). In addition to being Trustee of the Wynyard trust, Ms. Beiny is herself the…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Cirale v. 80 Pine Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. In re Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Hurlburt v. . HurlburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by58 opinions

  1. In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Lipin v. BenderNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Velez v. Hunts Point Multi-Service Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Felix v. BalkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  5. Mayorga v. TateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API