Legal Opinion

Velez v. Hunts Point Multi-Service Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 2006PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrias, J.P.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether, in the circumstances presented, the motion court properly granted motions to quash certain nonparty subpoenas duces tecum on the ground that they were defective on their face because they failed to comply with CPLR 3101 (a) (4), which requires that a request for disclosure from “any other person,” i.e., a nonparty witness, be “upon notice stating the circumstances or reasons such disclosure is sought or required.” For the following reasons, we reverse the motion court’s order to the extent appealed from and hold…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Terry D.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Reuters Ltd. v. Dow Jones Telerate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. MATTER OF STEVENS IMPS., INC. v. LackNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Wilson v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kapon v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Kooper v. KooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Troy Sand & Gravel Co. v. Town of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Bianchi v. Galster Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Morano v. Slattery Skanska, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API