Legal Opinion

Greene v. Greene

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1979PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Cooke.

The issue presented for review is whether plaintiffs counsel, the law firm of Eaton, Van Winkle, Greenspoon & Grutman, should be disqualified because two of the members of the firm were formerly partners in defendant law firm, Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine & Underberg. For divers reasons the Eaton firm should be disqualified.

In the action underlying this controversy, plaintiff, Helen Greene, alleges that the firm of Finley, Kumble and one of its partners, Theodore Greene, committed a breach of fiduciary duties, fraud, and a host of other wrongs in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. In re KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Watson v. WatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Eisemann v. . HazardNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. ShinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Mtr. of Abrams (John Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API