Legal Opinion
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Maritzen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 15, 1993No. 91-02-00923; CA A71056PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*168EDMONDS, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment arising out of a controversy submitted under ORCP 66 which held that plaintiff is not required to pay them uninsured motorists (UM) benefits for damages sustained in a motor vehicle accident in addition to that which has been paid. ORS 29.010 et seq. We review for errors of law and affirm.
The parties entered into the following stipulation of facts: Defendants Mann and Maritzen were injured in an automobile accident in 1987. At the time of the accident, Mann was driving an automobile owned by Maritzen and in which he was a passenger when it was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Totten v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- American Economy Insurance v. CanamoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Bergmann v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Wright v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Grijalva v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.