Legal Opinion
Krause v. Kim
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1985No. C6-85-989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment in a medical malpractice case where the trial court held that the statute of limitations had expired. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Robert L. Krause was injured in a car accident in December 1976. He was treated for the resulting pain by respondent, Mark K. Kim, M.D. Dr. Kim administered nerve block and acupuncture procedures. It is undisputed that the date of the last treatment was December 24, 1979. Krause, unassisted by counsel, brought a lawsuit against Dr. Kim, alleging negligence in administering the treatments,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Krause v. FarberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Dalco Corp. v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Berghuis v. KorthuisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- McBride v. BitnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krause v. FarberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Erickson v. Coast Catamaran Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Bliss v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996