Dalco Corp. v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant, Dalco Corporation (Dalco), instituted this action against a former employee, respondent Maurice Dixon, and against Dixon’s subsequent employer, respondent Brissman-Kennedy, Inc. (B-K), alleging that Dixon breached a non-compete employment agreement; that both respondents are unfairly competing with Dalco; that B-K has tortiously interfered with Dalco’s employment contract with Dixon and other contractual rights; and that as a result of all the foregoing, respondent B-K has illegally obtained an unfair competitive advantage over Dalco. Appellant sought both…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Erickson v. General United Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Freeman v. Duluth Clinic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Olson v. IscheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Rehabilitation Specialists, Inc. v. KoeringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Radisson Hotels International, Inc. v. Westin Hotel Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.