Legal Opinion

Dalco Corp. v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 23, 1983No. C1-82-1520PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Appellant, Dalco Corporation (Dalco), instituted this action against a former employee, respondent Maurice Dixon, and against Dixon’s subsequent employer, respondent Brissman-Kennedy, Inc. (B-K), alleging that Dixon breached a non-compete employment agreement; that both respondents are unfairly competing with Dalco; that B-K has tortiously interfered with Dalco’s employment contract with Dixon and other contractual rights; and that as a result of all the foregoing, respondent B-K has illegally obtained an unfair competitive advantage over Dalco. Appellant sought both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Erickson v. General United Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Freeman v. Duluth Clinic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Olson v. IscheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Rehabilitation Specialists, Inc. v. KoeringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Radisson Hotels International, Inc. v. Westin Hotel Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  5. Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API