Legal Opinion

Berghuis v. Korthuis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1949No. 34,880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s original complaint and from the order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint. As an amended pleading supersedes the original and is to be construed as the only one interposed in the case (5 Dunnell, Dig. & Supp. § 7706), no consideration will be given to the order sustaining the demurrer to the original complaint.

The amended complaint charges that on April 14, 1946, in the village of Prinsburg, Kandiyohi county, Rosalia Berghuis, three years of age, was struck by an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. In Re Estate of DanielSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Cashman v. HedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Bond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeCosse v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Ortiz Ex Rel. Ortiz v. GavendaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. McBride v. BitnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API