Legal Opinion

Krause v. Farber

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1985No. C2-85-990PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Appellant Robert L. Krause challenges a summary judgment granted respondents, Dr. Lawrence Farber and the Noran Neurological Clinic, P.A. The trial court ruled that Krause’s action was barred by the two-year statute of limitations applicable to medical malpractice actions. We affirm.

FACTS

Krause commenced this action by service of a summons and complaint on November 8, 1982. Krause alleged in his pro se complaint that the respondents had rendered negligent medical treatment. He also alleged misrepresentation a: 1 intentional infliction of emotional distress on the part of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. William R. Jewson v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wheeler v. Schmid Laboratories, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bruske v. HilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hoffner v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Daniel Rassier v. John SannerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API