Bliss v. Stevens
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
This case concerns a medical malpractice claim against respondent medical doctor. Appellant contends that the trial court erred when it summarily dismissed her suit on the ground that she failed to deliver the summons and complaint timely to the appropriate sheriff for service before the two-year statute of limitations expired. A disputed issue of fact remains whether, when she delivered the summons and complaint to the Hennepin County Sheriff, appellant reasonably believed that respondent doctor resided in Hennepin County. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Michele D.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997