Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Logan, Jolley, & Smith, L.L.P.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 18, 2009No. 4547PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEATHERS, J.:

This legal malpractice matter comes before this Court after the circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the law firm of Logan, Jolley, & Smith, LLP, James Jolley, Jr., and David Sumner (collectively Respondents) based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. On appeal, Gladys Kelly (Kelly) argues that she timely discovered her cause of action for legal malpractice less than three years prior to the filing of her complaint against Respondents. Alternatively, Kelly contends that Respondents should be equitably estopped from asserting the statute of limitations as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Burgess v. American Cancer Society, South Carolina Division, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Maher v. Tietex Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Manios v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLPCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Anita Chabek v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
  5. Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API