Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kimmer v. Wright

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 2, 2011No. 4902Published

1DissentFew, C.J.

Attorney Philip Wright concedes that a mistake he made in the course of representing Richard Kimmer in a workers’ compensation case was a breach of the duty he owed to his client. He thus concedes the first two elements of a legal malpractice claim existed as of the date of the mistake. However, as with many mistakes lawyers make in the course of litigation, no damage resulted from the mistake until the workers’ compensation commission denied benefits to Kimmer. At that point, the other two elements which must be present before a cause of action for legal malpractice accrues — causation and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Burgess v. American Cancer Society, South Carolina Division, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Rydde v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API