Legal Opinion

Kimmer v. Wright

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 2, 2011No. 4902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, J.

Philip Wright appeals the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment to Carol M. Kimmer, as personal representative of the estate of Richard Kimmer,1 in which the court held the statute of limitations had not run on Kimmer’s legal malpractice action. We reverse and remand.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 29,1999, Kimmer was injured in a motor vehicle accident as he was driving to work for his employer, Murata. He hired attorney Philip Wright to represent him. Without notice to Murata, Wright settled Kimmer’s claims with the at-fault driver’s insurance carrier for his policy limit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bayle v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Hooper v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Berry v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Basinger v. SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API