Manios v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLP
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
In this legal malpractice case, M & R Investors, LLC, and Louis Manios and Jimmy Rogers, Jr., as partners in M & R Investors (collectively, M & R), argue the trial court erred in: (1) denying M & R’s motion for new trial nisi additur; (2) striking M & R’s claim for damages for lost profits; (3) denying M & R’s motion for directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of legal malpractice; and (4) denying M & R’s motion for a new trial absolute on the issue of damages. In its cross-appeal, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, and David Hodge (collectively, Nelson…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Epstein v. Coastal Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Fettler v. GentnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Curtis v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.