Legal Opinion

Manios v. Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLP

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 15, 2010No. 4699PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.

In this legal malpractice case, M & R Investors, LLC, and Louis Manios and Jimmy Rogers, Jr., as partners in M & R Investors (collectively, M & R), argue the trial court erred in: (1) denying M & R’s motion for new trial nisi additur; (2) striking M & R’s claim for damages for lost profits; (3) denying M & R’s motion for directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the issue of legal malpractice; and (4) denying M & R’s motion for a new trial absolute on the issue of damages. In its cross-appeal, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, and David Hodge (collectively, Nelson…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Coastal Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Fettler v. GentnerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Curtis v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Kimmer v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API