Stanger v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendants appeal from the denial of their blended motion for judgment n.o.v., new trial, or remittitur, and from the order for judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict. The jury, by special verdict, found against defendants on the issue of fraud and awarded plaintiff employee $21,500 in compensatory damages and $12,900 in punitive damages. Defendants contend that the evidence does not support the findings of fraud or the award of damages; that irrelevant and prejudicial testimony by other employees of defendant Allied, Inc., was erroneously admitted; that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Weise v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- E. H. Boerth Co. v. Lad PropertiesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Nugent v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Seaton v. State Farm Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.