Legal Opinion
E. H. Boerth Co. v. Lad Properties
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1979No. Civ. 4-74-164PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant L. A. “Vern” Donnay’s motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, for a new trial, to vacate the order for judgment and judgment entered thereon or, in the alternative, for a remittitur of the damages. Plaintiff E. H. Boerth Company, a securities underwriter, brought this action against defendants in 1974, alleging that defendants’ course of conduct amounted to breach of contract, common law fraud, and a violation of SEC Rule 10b-5 and the parallel Minnesota provision, Minn.St. § 80A.01.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- A. T. Brod & Co. v. Jack Perlow and Adele Perlow, Also Known as Adele WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Rad Services, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Labor Relations Commission v. Fall River Educators Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- In Re Grain Land CoopDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.