Legal Opinion

Seaton v. State Farm Life Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1980No. Docket 44849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBashara, J.

This Court previously reversed and remanded for a new trial defendant’s jury verdict of no cause of action in plaintiffs suit to recover life insurance proceeds. Seaton v State Farm Life Ins Co, 75 Mich App 252; 254 NW2d 858 (1977). While the facts of the instant case are adequately set forth in our previous opinion, we note that, at retrial, the lower court, upon plaintiff’s motion, limited Dr. Collins’ testimony to those matters not privileged under MCL 600.2157; MSA 27A.2157. Therefore, Dr. Collins’ statement that he advised plaintiff’s husband of his cancerous condition in 1968 was not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grattan v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gilchrist v. Mystic Workers of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Nelson v. AckermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Beasley v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Dierickx v. Cottage Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API