Legal Opinion
Raley v. California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 7, 1977No. Civ. 15902PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, J.
Plaintiff Raley proposes to build a 26-acre regional shopping center called “Northshore Mall” adjacent to State Highway 28 near the northwest shore of Lake Tahoe. At Raley’s behest the trial court issued (1) a peremptory writ of prohibition 1 permanently restraining the California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (CTRPA) from interfering with his development, as well as a writ of mandate (2) directing the State Business and Transportation Agency and the State Department of Transportation to issue a highway encroachment permit and (3) ordering the County of Placer to issue…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strong v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Toigo v. Town of RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates v. Van De KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- 120 West Fayette Street, LLLP v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.