Legal Opinion
Toigo v. Town of Ross
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1998No. A078486PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, J.
I
Introduction
By this action, appellants Susanna Toigo, H. Skip Berg and Brenda Berg (collectively, Toigo), sought to compel respondents the Town of Ross, the Town Council of the Town of Ross, and current and former town coun-cilmembers Charles Goodman, Kelley Reid, Peter Barry, John Scott, and Mary Brown (collectively, the Town) to set aside the denial of Toigo’s 1994 application for a five-lot subdivision on their hillside property. Toigo challenged the Town’s decision on numerous grounds, three of which concern us here: 1) the Town abused its discretion in denying Toigo’s…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Schafer v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.