Legal Opinion
New v. Bradshaw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1922No. 11726PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLSON,- J.
This was an action to recover' damages for personal injury sustained bv the defendant in error while in the employ of plaintiff in error. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff -and defendants, respectively, as they -appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff alleged that on the 16th day of March, 1917, at about the hour of 8:45 p. m., he was employed by the defendants as conductor on one of their trains, known as the Night Mine Run, a train running between Henryetta and Dewar; that he attempted to get on the" engine of said train for the purpose of informing the engineer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. FickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Spurrier Lumber Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Menten v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Jenkins v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Star v. BrumleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Eagle-Picher Mining & Smelting Co. v. DrinkwineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Bison Transports, Inc. v. FraleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.