Legal Opinion

Star v. Brumley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1928No. 17854PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, Y. C. J.

The defendant in error was plaintiff and the plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court, and, for convenience, they will be referred to herein as they there appeared.

The plaintiff, Brumley, sued George Little Star, Charley Kirk, and Louis Drexil to reco'ver $15,192, as damages for injuries alleged to halve been received by reason of the negligence of the defendants in carelessly and recklessly driving a Cadillac automobile against and over the plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s evidence discloses, substantially, the following facts:

Plaintiff testified that he was driving alone in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. New v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. CoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lakeview, Inc. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Barnett v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API