Wood v. Mesmer
California Court of Appeal
MOTION to dismiss appeal. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, J., pro tem.
Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal and affirm the judgment on the ground of appellant’s failure to file his brief in time. Appellant’s brief was due on August 5, 1918, at which time an order was made extending the time to and including August 25th. On August 28th, on ex parte motion therefor and affidavit filed, a second order was made “that the' time for filing appellant’s brief in the above-entitled cause shall be and the same is hereby extended sixty days from the date hereof.” This motion to dismiss was made October 28th, pursuant to notice served and filed October…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Clark v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- McCabe v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Brooks v. Union Trust & Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- City & County of San Francisco v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Yolo Water & Power Co. v. EdmandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Borgmeyer v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Bourne v. RootCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943