Legal Opinion
Bourne v. Root
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 1931No. Docket No. 729PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLISON, J., pro tem.
The motion, to dismiss the appeal in this case is based on the ground that the appellants have not filed their opening brief on such appeal and that the time provided for filing of appellants’ brief herein has expired. The transcript was filed on the first day of August, 1931. The time for appellants to file their opening brief expired on the thirty-first day of August, 1931. Notice of presentation of the motion to dismiss the appeal was served and filed on the second day of October, 1931.
It appears from the affidavits filed on behalf of the appellants in opposition to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brooks v. Union Trust & Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Carter v. PaigeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Chapman v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Pacific Power Co. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hotels El Rancho, Inc. v. PrayNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Morris v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933