Legal Opinion

Clark v. Crane

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,607PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Application for the writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

This is an application by F. J. Clark for a writ of mandamus to the Hon. A. M. Crane, Judge as above stated, commanding him to proceed to settle the statement and bill of exceptions in the case of the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company against the above applicant Clark, and to proceed to hear a motion for a new trial after said statement has been settled.

The following are the facts which appear, and on which this application must be decided. A trial came on in the case above named before the Court (the judge aforesaid presiding) and a -jury. A verdict was rendered for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Calderwood v. PeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Castro v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Quivey v. GambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Pieper v. Centinela Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API