Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Buckman

California Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1886No. 15897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a new trial.. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The action was brought to obtain a decree restraining the defendant, his agents, servants, and employees from digging into, tearing up, or in any way interfering with the roadway, roadbed, sidewalks, or grade of Market street, between the points of its junction with Valencia street and Seventeenth street, in the city and county of San Francisco.

The defendant, by his answer, admitted that he had commenced, with a large force of men, to grade a portion of Market street between the points named; and to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boise City v. SinselIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Flinn & Treacy v. MowryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. City of Turlock v. BristowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Town of Seaford v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API