Legal Opinion

Voters for Responsible Retirement v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1994No. S034268PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

—In this case we are called upon to decide whether a county’s decision to enter into an agreement with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), to enable its employees to join PERS’s retirement plan, is subject to approval or rejection by the local electorate via referendum. Respondent Trinity County (the County) advances several constitutional and statutory arguments designed to establish that decisions of a county board of supervisors regarding employee compensation generally, and decisions regarding the adoption or implementation of memoranda of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API